Explainer · Defamation · Last verified October 2026
Civil vs Criminal Defamation (2026)
Defamation in India is both a civil wrong and a criminal offence, and the two are not the same fight. A civil case asks a civil court for money and an order to stop the statement; a criminal case asks a magistrate to punish the person who made it. They differ in where you go, what you must prove, how long they take, and what you walk away with. Choosing the wrong one wastes time and leverage. This explainer, for anyone whose reputation has been attacked, sets the two side by side, so you can see what each route offers and which suits your purpose. It is general information, not legal advice. Last verified October 2026.
- Two remedies: civil defamation (a tort) for damages and an injunction, and criminal defamation for punishment.
- Criminal law now: Section 356 of the BNS, 2023 replaced IPC 499 and 500; punishment up to two years, fine or community service.
- Different courts: civil goes to a civil court as a suit; criminal goes to a magistrate as a complaint by the aggrieved person.
- Different proof: civil on the balance of probabilities; criminal beyond reasonable doubt, a higher bar.
- Same defences: truth for the public good, fair comment and privilege answer both routes.
01The short answer
Defamation gives you two separate remedies, and you can pursue both at once:
- Civil defamation is a tort. You file a suit in a civil court for money damages and an injunction to stop or remove the statement. The aim is to repair your reputation and your loss.
- Criminal defamation is an offence under Section 356 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023. You file a complaint before a magistrate, and the aim is to punish the person, with up to two years in jail, a fine, or community service.
In short: civil gets you compensation and removal; criminal gets the wrongdoer punished. Civil is decided on the balance of probabilities; criminal needs proof beyond reasonable doubt, which is a higher bar.
02What defamation is
Defamation is a false statement, spoken or written, that is published to someone other than the person it is about, and that lowers that person's reputation in the eyes of others. All three parts matter: the statement must be untrue, it must reach a third person, and it must be damaging.
Both the civil and the criminal routes are built on this same idea. The difference is not what defamation is, but what the law does about it: a civil court compensates the victim, while a criminal court punishes the maker. A single defamatory post can give rise to both a civil suit and a criminal complaint.
03Civil defamation
Civil defamation is a tort, a civil wrong developed through court decisions rather than a single code section. The injured person sues in a civil court and asks for two things: damages, a sum of money for the harm to reputation and any loss, and an injunction, an order that the defendant take down or stop repeating the statement.
The standard of proof is the balance of probabilities, the ordinary civil standard, which is lower than in a criminal case. A civil court can also grant an early, interim injunction to stop ongoing publication while the suit runs, which is often the real prize for someone facing a live online attack.
04Criminal defamation
Criminal defamation is now an offence under Section 356 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023, which replaced Sections 499 and 500 of the old Indian Penal Code. The punishment is imprisonment up to two years, or a fine, or both, or community service.
It is not an offence the police register on their own. A magistrate takes cognizance only on a complaint by the person defamed, under Section 222 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023. The standard of proof is beyond reasonable doubt, the criminal standard. Because it can lead to jail, criminal defamation carries more threat, but it is harder to win and the complainant does not get compensation out of it.
05Side by side
| Feature | Civil defamation | Criminal defamation |
|---|---|---|
| Nature | A tort (civil wrong) | An offence under Section 356 BNS, 2023 |
| Where you go | Civil court (a suit) | Magistrate (a complaint) |
| What you seek | Damages and an injunction | Punishment of the wrongdoer |
| Standard of proof | Balance of probabilities | Beyond reasonable doubt |
| Result | Money and removal of the statement | Jail up to 2 years, fine or community service |
| Who starts it | The injured person as plaintiff | The injured person as complainant |
You are not forced to pick one. Many people send a legal notice, then run a civil suit for damages and an injunction while also filing a criminal complaint to add pressure.
06Defences that apply to both
The same core defences answer both routes, which is why a weak case fails in either court:
- Truth for the public good. A true statement made in the public interest is a defence. Truth alone answers a civil claim; the criminal section also asks that it be for the public good.
- Fair comment. An honest opinion on a matter of public interest, based on facts, is protected.
- Privilege. Statements in court, in legislatures and in certain official settings are protected.
The criminal offence also carries a set of specific statutory exceptions. The practical point is that if the statement is true and in the public interest, neither a civil suit nor a criminal complaint is likely to succeed.
07Which route to choose
Match the route to your goal.
- Want the statement removed and your loss paid? The civil suit, with an interim injunction, is usually the better tool. It is built around compensation and removal.
- Want to deter and punish a deliberate, malicious attack? The criminal complaint carries the threat of a conviction, though the higher standard of proof makes it harder.
- Facing a live, spreading online post? Speed matters, and an interim injunction plus a takedown route is often the first move.
For the filing mechanics of either path, see how to file a defamation case. A firm first step is often a legal notice: see how to send a legal notice for defamation.
The choice turns on your facts and the evidence. Defamation cases are fact heavy and the defences are strong, so take advice before you file.
undefined
08Where Claw fits
Claw is an all-in-one legaltech platform for Indian advocates, law firms, and corporate legal teams, combining AI-based case search, an AI legal assistant (Legal GPT), case management, and compliance automation across all Indian courts and tribunals.
Deciding between a civil suit and a criminal complaint, and drafting either, is work for you and your advocate; Claw does not file it. Where Claw helps is research and tracking. Claw tracks civil defamation suits in the civil courts and High Courts and criminal defamation complaints before the magistrate and sessions courts, along with the appeals that follow to the High Courts and the Supreme Court, across 9,102 courts, benches and forums, with alerts and monitoring, so a party or an adviser sees every movement in a case. Its Legal GPT researches across 30 crore+ judgments, with Supreme Court decisions from 1950 and High Court decisions from 1990, so you can see how courts have treated comparable statements and the truth and public interest defences. Results return in under 5 seconds, and Claw does not train its AI models on your documents. To check whether a person or company already has defamation or other litigation on record, run a case search across Indian courts by name. A clean result means nothing was found on the forums and date searched, not that nothing exists, and this is general information, not legal advice.
Related reading: how to file a defamation case, defamation under BNS Section 356, and how to respond to a defamation notice.
09Sources and further reading
- India Code (Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 and BNSS, 2023): indiacode.nic.in
- eCourts (case status): ecourts.gov.in
- Supreme Court of India (judgments): sci.gov.in
- Claw: clawlaw.in
This explainer is general information, not legal advice. Defamation turns on the exact words, their context and the evidence; take advice before acting.
10Frequently asked questions
What is the difference between civil and criminal defamation in India?
Civil defamation is a tort: you sue in a civil court for money damages and an injunction to stop or remove the statement. Criminal defamation is an offence under Section 356 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023: you file a complaint before a magistrate to have the wrongdoer punished with up to two years in jail, a fine or community service. Civil aims at compensation and removal; criminal aims at punishment.
Which section covers criminal defamation now?
Criminal defamation is Section 356 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023, which replaced Sections 499 and 500 of the Indian Penal Code. A magistrate takes cognizance only on a complaint by the person defamed, under Section 222 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023. The punishment is imprisonment up to two years, or a fine, or both, or community service.
Can I file both a civil and a criminal defamation case?
Yes. The two are separate remedies and you can pursue both over the same statement. Many people run a civil suit for damages and an injunction while also filing a criminal complaint to add pressure. They are decided independently, in different courts and on different standards of proof.
Which is easier to win, civil or criminal defamation?
Civil defamation is generally easier because it is decided on the balance of probabilities, the ordinary civil standard. Criminal defamation needs proof beyond reasonable doubt, a higher bar, and can lead to jail, so courts are careful. A civil suit also offers an interim injunction to stop a live statement, which criminal proceedings do not.
Is criminal defamation still valid law in India?
Yes. The Supreme Court in Subramanian Swamy v Union of India (2016) upheld the constitutional validity of criminal defamation. The offence has since been recast as Section 356 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023, but the remedy remains available alongside the civil route.