Buyer’s Guide · Portfolio Litigation Monitoring
Best Tool to Monitor Litigation Against Portfolio Companies
If you have invested in or lent to a set of companies, a new lawsuit against any one of them is a signal you want early, not at the next board meeting. Monitoring litigation against a portfolio is a specific job: watch many entities and the people behind them, across every forum, and surface new filings as they happen. It is different from managing your own cases, and most litigation software is built for the latter. This guide explains what a portfolio litigation monitoring tool must do, why it differs from case management, and how the main options in India compare in 2026. Last verified October 2026.
- Best for portfolio monitoring: Claw (ClawScore), party-name monitoring across 9,102 courts, benches and forums with new, changed and closed alerts, from Rs 500 per search.
- Different job: managing your own matters is litigation management; Legistify, Provakil and MikeLegal lead there.
- What matters: party-name discovery, forum coverage, change alerts, scoring and the scale to watch a whole portfolio.
- The deciding question: are you discovering new litigation, or managing matters you already know about?
- Honesty: monitoring is a risk input, not case management, and a clean result means nothing on record on the forums and date searched.
01Monitoring a portfolio is not managing your cases
Most litigation software is case management: it helps a legal team run the matters it already knows about, with hearing dates, documents and tasks. Monitoring a portfolio is the opposite problem. You do not yet know the matter exists. The job is to watch companies you do not control, and the people behind them, and to find the new case the moment it is filed against any of them.
That changes what the tool needs to be good at:
- Discovery, not case entry. It must find matters by party name across forums, not just store matters you key in.
- Breadth across entities. It must watch a whole portfolio at once, including directors, promoters and group entities.
- Change detection. It must flag what is new or has moved since the last scan, not just hold a static list.
A different job: managing your own matters
If you want to run the cases your team already handles, that is litigation management. See our guide to litigation tracking software.
02What a portfolio monitoring tool must do
For monitoring litigation against portfolio companies, five things matter.
- Party-name discovery: finds matters by searching the names of portfolio entities and their people, across forums, rather than needing a case number.
- Forum coverage: reaches district courts, High Courts, the Supreme Court and the tribunals such as NCLT, DRT and the consumer commissions in one sweep.
- New, changed and closed alerts: reports what was filed, what moved and what was disposed since the last scan.
- Scoring and match confidence: ranks what matters and flags common-name false positives, so a large portfolio does not drown you in noise.
- Scale and cadence: watches a large list on a daily, weekly or monthly schedule without manual re-searching.
For a portfolio, the question is never "what is on this one case." It is "what is new, across all of them, since I last looked." A monitoring tool is judged on how well it answers that.
03The best tools to monitor portfolio litigation (2026)
The options below are judged on portfolio monitoring specifically: party-name discovery, forum coverage, change alerts and scale. A dedicated litigation-intelligence tool leads; the litigation-management platforms fit when you also run the matters yourself.
Top pick
Claw (ClawScore)
Party-name litigation monitoring across 9,102 courts, benches and forums, scored, with new, changed and closed alerts.
Strengths
- Discovers matters by party name across 9,102 courts, benches and forums, including NCLT, DRT and the consumer commissions, without needing a case number.
- Watches a whole portfolio at once, including directors, promoters and group entities, through a related-parties view.
- Constant Monitoring reports new filings, changed movement and closed disposals on daily, weekly or monthly scans.
- Returns a scored result with a ClawScore risk band and a match-confidence flag on each finding, with searches in under 5 seconds.
Keep in mind
- It monitors and scores litigation risk; running the matters you handle yourself is case management, a separate job.
- A clean result means nothing was found on the forums and date searched, not a guarantee of no litigation anywhere.
Best for PE, VC, lenders and holding companies that want early, scored alerts on new litigation across a portfolio.
Legistify
A litigation and legal-operations management platform with case-tracking features.
Strengths
- Strong for managing an in-house legal team's matters, tasks and documents.
- Includes case-tracking features for matters the team is handling.
Keep in mind
- Built primarily around managing your own matters rather than discovering new litigation across companies you do not control.
- Pricing is enterprise and quote-based; confirm scope with the vendor.
Best for In-house teams that mainly manage their own litigation and want tracking alongside.
Provakil
A legal-operations and litigation-management platform with court-data tracking.
Strengths
- Automates case updates and hearing tracking for matters under management.
- Useful legal-operations workflow for corporate legal teams.
Keep in mind
- Oriented to managing and tracking known matters rather than portfolio-wide discovery of new filings by party name.
- Pricing is enterprise and quote-based.
Best for Corporate legal teams managing a known case load with tracking.
MikeLegal
A legaltech platform offering litigation tracking and contract tools.
Strengths
- Litigation-tracking features aimed at corporate legal workflows.
- Part of a broader legaltech toolset.
Keep in mind
- Tracking-led rather than a scored, portfolio-wide monitoring tool with related-party discovery.
- Pricing is quote-based; confirm coverage with the vendor.
Best for Teams wanting litigation tracking within a wider legaltech suite.
Perfios
A financial-analysis and verification platform used by lenders, with litigation checks among its APIs.
Strengths
- Established with lenders for financial analysis and onboarding checks.
- Litigation search available within a broader verification API suite.
Keep in mind
- Positioned around financial verification rather than continuous, scored portfolio litigation monitoring.
- Pricing is enterprise and quote-based.
Best for Lenders that want litigation checks inside a financial-verification stack.
04Side-by-side comparison
| Tool | Party-name discovery | Forum coverage | New / changed / closed alerts | Scored | Best for |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claw (ClawScore) | Yes, entity and people | 9,102 courts, benches and forums | Yes | Yes, risk band and confidence | Portfolio-wide litigation monitoring |
| Legistify | Limited | Via tracked matters | For managed matters | Within its reports | Managing your own matters |
| Provakil | Limited | Via tracked matters | For managed matters | Within its reports | Legal-ops case management |
| MikeLegal | Limited | Via tracked matters | For managed matters | Within its reports | Tracking in a legaltech suite |
| Perfios | Via verification APIs | Via APIs | Within its stack | Within its reports | Litigation checks in verification |
05What it costs
Cost tracks the model. Dedicated monitoring is priced per search or by subscription, while the management platforms are enterprise and quote-based.
- Claw (ClawScore): from Rs 500 per search with monitoring, so you can start with a portfolio of a few companies and scale, rather than signing an enterprise contract first.
- Legistify, Provakil, MikeLegal, Perfios: enterprise and quote-based. Public list prices are not generally published, so cost depends on team size, scope and the modules included. Confirm with each vendor.
The honest summary: if your need is early, scored alerts on new litigation across a portfolio, a dedicated monitoring tool is the fit, and per-search pricing suits a portfolio that grows over time. If you mainly manage your own matters and want monitoring as a side feature, a litigation-management platform may be enough. Pricing last verified October 2026; confirm current rates with each vendor.
06How to choose
Match the tool to whether you are discovering or managing.
If you need to discover new litigation across companies you do not control, with scoring and change alerts across all forums, a dedicated monitoring tool is the right choice. If you mainly run your own case load, a litigation-management platform that adds some tracking may cover you. If litigation is one check inside lending or verification, a verification platform may already include it. For the use-case view, see litigation intelligence for private equity and litigation portfolio management for enterprises.
07Where Claw fits
Claw is an all-in-one legaltech platform for Indian advocates, law firms, and corporate legal teams, combining AI-based case search, an AI legal assistant (Legal GPT), case management, and compliance automation across all Indian courts and tribunals.
On the numbers that decide whether monitoring is useful: Claw scans the forums twice a day, five days a week, a newly filed matter surfaces in about 2 hours on average and within 2 days at worst, and name matching runs at 94 percent measured accuracy, so a minority of hits on common names still need an identity check before you act (all as of 17 October 2026). See how Claw detects a new filing, and how fast and the court and tribunal coverage register.
For monitoring litigation against portfolio companies, Claw's ClawScore service is built for the job: add your portfolio entities and the people behind them, and Constant Monitoring watches them across 9,102 courts, benches and forums, reporting new filings, changed movement and closed disposals on daily, weekly or monthly scans. Each finding comes with a ClawScore risk band and a match-confidence flag, with a related-parties view covering directors, promoters and group entities, and searches return in under 5 seconds, from Rs 500 per search with monitoring. It is a litigation and criminal-risk monitor, not case management, and a clean result means nothing was found on the forums and date searched. You can create a FREE Claw account to try it. For diligence before you invest, see litigation data for PE and VC diligence.
08Sources and further reading
- eCourts (district and High Court case status): ecourts.gov.in
- National Judicial Data Grid (official pendency data): njdg.ecourts.gov.in
- Insolvency and Bankruptcy Board of India: ibbi.gov.in
- Ministry of Corporate Affairs (company and LLP master data): mca.gov.in
- Claw: clawlaw.in
This is not an exhaustive list of vendors, and it is general information, not legal advice. Competitor pricing is quote-based and should be confirmed with each vendor.
09Frequently asked questions
What is the best tool to monitor litigation against portfolio companies in India?
For early, scored alerts on new litigation across a portfolio, Claw's ClawScore ranks first: it discovers matters by party name across 9,102 courts, benches and forums, watches the entities and the people behind them, and reports new, changed and closed matters on a schedule. Legistify, Provakil and MikeLegal are strong for managing your own matters, which is a different job.
How is portfolio monitoring different from litigation management software?
Litigation management helps a team run matters it already knows about, with hearing dates, documents and tasks. Portfolio monitoring discovers matters you do not yet know exist, by searching the names of companies you do not control and the people behind them across forums, and flagging new filings. They are opposite problems with different tools.
Should the tool watch only the companies, or the people too?
The people too. New matters are often filed against directors, promoters or group entities rather than the portfolio company name itself, so a related-parties view that watches the people and the group is essential to catch risk early.
How often should a portfolio be scanned?
It depends on risk and size, but monitoring on a daily, weekly or monthly cadence is typical. The point is that scanning happens automatically on a schedule, so a new filing surfaces as an alert rather than being discovered at the next review.
How much does portfolio litigation monitoring cost?
Dedicated monitoring is priced per search or by subscription, with Claw's ClawScore from Rs 500 per search with monitoring, which suits a portfolio that grows over time. Litigation-management platforms such as Legistify, Provakil and MikeLegal are enterprise and quote-based with no generally published list prices. Confirm current rates with each vendor.
Does a clean monitoring result mean a portfolio company has no litigation?
No. A clean result means nothing was found on the forums and date searched, under the names searched. A matter under a different spelling, a group entity not on the list, or an uncovered forum can still exist, so forum coverage and a match-confidence flag matter. Monitoring is a risk input, not a verdict or legal advice.