Can Reserved Candidates Avail Relaxation to Participate in Open Competition with General Candidates?

Published on: September 16, 2025
Last updated: 12 July 2026

In this blog, we will explore the Supreme Court's recent judgment on whether reserved candidates who have availed relaxation in fees or upper age limit to participate in open competition with general candidates can be recruited against unreserved seats.

Can Reserved Candidates Participate in Open Competition with General Candidates?

What is the Case About?

The Supreme Court was deciding appeals filed by the Union of India against a High Court judgment that allowed certain OBC (Other Backward Class) candidates to be considered for appointment in the unreserved category, even though they had availed age relaxation to participate in the recruitment process.

The key facts of the case are:

  • The Staff Selection Commission (SSC) published a notification for the recruitment of Constables (GD) in various central armed police forces.
  • The notification prescribed an age limit of 18-23 years as on August 1, 2015, with age relaxation given to various reserved categories, including 3 years for OBC candidates.
  • The respondents, who were OBC candidates, availed the age relaxation to participate in the recruitment process.
  • However, they were declared unsuccessful as they had scored marks lower than the last selected candidate in the OBC category for various departments.
  • Despite this, their marks were higher than the last selected candidate in the unreserved category for those departments.
  • The respondents approached the High Court, claiming they should be permitted to migrate to the unreserved category.
  • The High Court ruled in favor of the respondents, holding that the refusal to permit them to migrate to the unreserved category, despite scoring higher than the last selected candidate, would be opposed to the principles of merit-based recruitment and equality under the Constitution.
  • The Union of India appealed against this judgment in the Supreme Court.
  • What did the Supreme Court Decide?

    The Supreme Court, in its judgment, explained that whether a reserved candidate who has availed relaxation in fees or upper age limit to participate in open competition with general candidates can be recruited against unreserved seats would depend on the facts of each case.

    The Court stated that if there is no embargo in the recruitment rules or employment notification, such reserved candidates who have scored higher than the last selected unreserved candidate shall be entitled to migrate and be recruited against unreserved seats.

    However, the Court also noted that if there is an embargo imposed under the relevant recruitment rules, such reserved candidates shall not be permitted to migrate to the general category seats.

    In the present case, the Court observed that the respondents had availed the concession of age relaxation for participating in the recruitment process. In the face of the relevant office memorandum, the High Court was wrong in applying the ratio of the Jitendra Kumar case and permitting the respondents to be considered for appointment in the unreserved category.

    Conclusion

    The Supreme Court's judgment clarifies that the ability of reserved candidates to participate in open competition with general candidates and be recruited against unreserved seats depends on the specific rules and regulations governing the recruitment process.

    While the Court recognizes the principle of merit-based recruitment, it also acknowledges the need to balance it with the provisions for reservation and relaxation in favor of certain categories of candidates. The decision emphasizes the importance of adhering to the rules and regulations set forth in the recruitment process.

    How Claw Legaltech Can Be Useful in Such Cases

    [Claw Legaltech](https://clawlaw.in/) can be a valuable tool in navigating complex legal issues like the one discussed in this blog. Here's how the features of Claw Legaltech can be helpful:

  • **AI-Based Legal Assistant (Legal GPT)**: Claw's Legal GPT can help analyze the relevant laws, regulations, and precedents related to the recruitment process and the rules governing the participation of reserved candidates in open competition. It can provide guidance on the legal principles and interpretation of the applicable rules.
  • **AI-Based Case Search**: Claw's case search feature can assist in quickly finding and accessing relevant judgments, like the one discussed in this blog, to understand the legal precedents and the Court's reasoning.
  • **Case Summarization**: The case summarization feature of Claw can help in quickly grasping the key points of the Supreme Court's judgment, making it easier to understand and apply the principles in similar situations.
  • By leveraging the advanced features of Claw Legaltech, legal professionals can navigate complex legal issues, stay updated on the latest developments, and provide well-informed advice to their clients, ensuring a more efficient and effective legal practice.

    Explore CLAW

    The tools behind the guides

    CLAW helps Indian advocates and firms manage cases, track courts and research the law.